Notable case, Māpua, Tasman, New Zealand

Former Fruitgrowers Chemical Company site, Māpua

Māpua

At Māpua, on the Waimea estuary, a factory making pesticides for the orchards ran from 1932 to 1988 and left DDT, dieldrin, aldrin and lindane in soil, groundwater and sediment. It is New Zealand's national clean-up case: the soil was treated on site with a new technology, mechano-chemical dehalogenation, at twice the planned cost and time.

At a glance

Area
5.1 ha on land1
Activity
1932–1988
People affected
200 (2016)2
Media
soil, groundwater, sediment
Kind of site
agrochemicals, chemical works, landfill
  1. Area. About 5.1 hectares including coastal sediments (Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, 2008): 2.8 ha of original factory land, 0.7 ha of reclaimed land and 1.6 ha of sediments and adjacent land.
  2. People affected. Residents eligible for the study of exposure during the clean-up (McBride et al. 2016).

Contaminants

Status

Remediated

Soil works ended in 2007 and the site was handed back to Tasman District Council in November 2007. The Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment's report (2008) notes, however, that groundwater quality had not improved and that no further works were planned; the council was continuing quarterly monitoring. Groundwater status after 2008 was not verified.

Story

The Fruitgrowers Chemical Company built its plant in 1932, in the centre of the village. According to Wikipedia, from the 1940s it made organomercury and organochlorine pesticides, including DDT, DDD, dieldrin, 2,4-D and paraquat, and organophosphates from the 1960s; by 1978 it was using 124 chemicals in 84 formulations. A minerals processor, Mintech, worked on the same site, and the two factories had their own landfill. When the plant closed in 1988 the soil, the groundwater, the Waimea Inlet and the estuarine sediments were contaminated, and the site was left with no liable party able to pay.

Tasman District Council became the owner between 1989 and 1996. In 1999 the government allocated 3.1 million New Zealand dollars. Taking the soil away would have meant many truck movements and was ruled out; in November 2001 a contract was signed to treat it on site by mechano-chemical dehalogenation (MCD), in which a ball mill grinds the soil finely and triggers the destruction of chlorinated compounds. Formal trials in 2004 showed that the plant brought soil within the acceptance criteria, but in one of them a breakdown led to the formation and release of small quantities of dioxin.

Between February 2005 and July 2007 about 8,000 m³ of soil went through the reactor, 30% more than the 6,161 estimated, at 83 m³ a week against the 108 in the contract. In all, more than 60,000 m³ was excavated and over 8,000 samples analysed; the site was capped with half a metre of residential-quality soil. The works took more than three years instead of 18 months and cost about 12 million New Zealand dollars instead of 6. In 2008 the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment published a critical investigation of the management, the emission controls and the groundwater, and recommended that New Zealand set up a system of independent environmental auditors.

Timeline

  1. 1932The Fruitgrowers Chemical Company opens its plant.
  2. 1988The factory closes.
  3. 1999The government allocates NZ$3.1 million for remediation.
  4. 2001November: the contract is signed; the proof-of-performance MCD plant is installed.
  5. 2004Formal plant trials; treatment begins in October.
  6. 2007July: soil treatment ends. November: the site returns to Tasman District Council.
  7. 2008July: investigation report by the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment.

Health

A study commissioned by the Ministry of Health compared 139 Māpua residents with 139 referents and analysed 30 serum samples: 2,3,7,8-TCDD was below the detection limit in most samples and neither dioxin levels nor health status differed significantly, although residents scored lower on quality of life (McBride et al. 2016). According to Wikipedia, a 2012 Department of Labour report found respiratory problems, nausea and fatigue in some of the roughly 30 clean-up workers.

Remediation

  1. 2004mechano-chemical dehalogenationOn-site treatment of 8,067 m³ of soil in a ball-mill reactor (2004–2007).
  2. 2007excavation and cappingExcavation of more than 60,000 m³ and capping of the whole site with 0.5 m of clean soil; more than 12,000 m³ of topsoil, clay and gravel brought in.

From the literature

Species that acted on one of this site's contaminants in at least one study. The list is automatic and takes no account of this site's soil, concentrations or climate.

Plants

Fungi

The rest are on the contaminant pages.

Sources

  1. Investigation into the remediation of the contaminated site at Mapua, Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment (New Zealand), 2008
  2. McBride D. et al. Community exposure to hazardous site remediation in rural New Zealand: an exposed-referent study of serum dioxins and health effects, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 2016
  3. Māpua, New Zealand, Wikipedia, 2026

Draft compiled from public sources, not yet reviewed.