Site of National Interest (SIN), Venezia, Veneto, Italy

Porto Marghera (Venice)

A large industrial and port zone on the edge of the Venice lagoon, grown since 1917 on land reclaimed partly with process waste: chemicals, petrochemicals, refining, metallurgy. The made ground and the groundwater hold metals, PAHs and organochlorines, including vinyl chloride and PCBs.

PhytoremediationMicrobial bioremediation

At a glance

Area
1,618 ha on land1
Activity
since 1917
People affected
258,685 (2019)2
Media
soil, groundwater, sediment, air
Kind of site
petrochemicals, chemical works, port, landfill
  1. Area. The 2000 perimeter was redrawn by decrees of 24 April 2013 and 22 December 2016; 1,618 ha on land (ISPRA, 2024). SENTIERI describes the original site as covering about 5,730 ha, part of it lagoon.
  2. People affected. Residents of the municipality of Venice, 2019 census (SENTIERI, Sixth Report).

Contaminants

Status

Remediation under way

Soil: 95% characterised, remediation or containment project approved for 70%, procedure concluded for 28%. Groundwater: 95% characterised, project approved for 61%, concluded for 14% (ISPRA, June 2024). In 2019 ISPRA reported stretches of bank still without containment walls and areas not yet connected to the Fusina plant.

Story

The Porto Marghera industrial zone began in 1917 as an extension of the port of Venice for oil and coal. Chemicals, petrochemicals, refineries, metallurgy and electrometallurgy, and power generation followed. Many plants have since closed, but Porto Marghera is still one of Italy's main chemical districts.

The pollution has three origins, according to the parliamentary commission of inquiry on the waste cycle: the shoreline was pushed forward using waste from the first industrial zone as fill; chlorinated compounds such as vinyl chloride monomer and PCBs were released unchecked into soil and groundwater; and what was emitted to the air fell back to the ground. The soil holds arsenic, chromium, mercury, nickel and PAHs; the groundwater the same metals, PAHs and organochlorines.

The site has been a SIN since 1998. The 2004 Master Plan divides it into 15 "macro-islands" to be enclosed by containment walls along the banks, which keep contaminated groundwater from leaving for the lagoon; the water drained behind the walls goes to the Fusina Integrated Project, the plant that also treats industrial effluent and rainwater from the polluted sites. The programme agreement of 16 April 2012 simplified procedures and set operating protocols, including one for experimental remediation, which needs no prior authorisation.

In 2019 some stretches still had no containment (for instance Alcoa and Enel, under regional responsibility) and some areas were not yet piped to Fusina; changes of ownership and the difficulty of identifying those responsible have slowed the procedures.

Timeline

  1. 1917Development of the Porto Marghera industrial zone begins, as an extension of the port of Venice.
  2. 1998Law 426/1998 lists Venice (Porto Marghera) among the first Sites of National Interest.
  3. 2000The decree of 23 February sets the first perimeter.
  4. 2004The remediation Master Plan is approved: 15 macro-islands and containment walls along the banks.
  5. 201216 April: programme agreement for the remediation and environmental upgrading of the site.
  6. 2013The decree of 24 April redraws the perimeter of the site.
  7. 2019ISPRA hearing before the parliamentary commission: stretches of bank still lack containment.

Health

SENTIERI, Sixth Report (mortality 2013–2017, hospital admissions 2014–2018; municipality of Venice, 258,685 residents): in both sexes there is excess overall mortality and excess mortality from all cancers, from cancers of the colon-rectum, liver, lung and bladder, from pleural mesothelioma and from leukaemia; admissions for chronic liver disease and cirrhosis are also in excess (men SHR 144, 90% CI 131–157; women SHR 131, 90% CI 116–148). The report confirms that the excesses for asbestos-related diseases persist. A 2020 study of residents by district (2000–2014) found the highest death rates from all cancers and from lung cancer in Marghera.

Remediation

  1. 2004containment wallsContainment walls along the banks of the industrial canals around the macro-islands, built by the Venice Water Authority, the Port Authority and the Region; still incomplete in 2019.
  2. —pump and treatGroundwater drained behind the containment walls and that collected by the companies is sent to the Fusina Integrated Project for treatment.

Plants and fungi at this site

PhytoremediationField scale

Helianthus annuus, Brassica juncea

In-situ phytoextraction of cadmium, mercury and zinc inside the Porto Marghera industrial area, using two high-biomass crops, sunflower and Indian mustard. The paper reports early results of the ongoing trial and the microcosm and mesocosm tests used to choose the treatments.

Outcome Using EDTA and ammonium thiosulphate together during phytoextraction raised the removal efficiency of Cd, Hg and Zn from the soil (the abstract gives no figures).

Microbial bioremediationLaboratory, with soil from the site

Anaerobic microcosms at the University of Bologna with PCB-contaminated sediments (1.5–2.5 mg/kg) taken at three points of the Porto Marghera area, suspended in lagoon water or in a salt medium and followed for months. The aim was to see whether bacteria already living in the sediment can dechlorinate weathered PCBs.

Outcome Highly chlorinated PCBs fell and low-chlorinated, often ortho-substituted congeners built up; the transformation went further in site water. In a later test dechlorination began after five months, once sulphate was used up, and went on until the sixteenth; added coplanar PCBs were about 90% transformed.

Microbial bioremediationField pilot

Pilot-scale composting of soot-contaminated soil from the Porto Marghera industrial zone, with about 200 mg/kg of PAHs and a pH near 12.8. The soil was mixed with sewage sludge and yard waste in a closed tank: 60 days of forced aeration, then 70 of natural aeration.

Outcome After a lag of about 30 days, needed for the pH to drop, PAHs declined to an overall degradation of about 68% in 130 days, more marked for 2–4 ring PAHs.

From the literature

Species that acted on one of this site's contaminants in at least one study. The list is automatic and takes no account of this site's soil, concentrations or climate.

Plants

  • Medicago sativaAlfalfa, lucernePolychlorinated biphenylsPetroleum hydrocarbonsPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsEvidence: field
  • Arabidopsis halleriHaller's rockcressZincCadmiumEvidence: field
  • Cucurbita pepoZucchini, pumpkinPolychlorinated biphenylsDioxins and furansEvidence: field
  • Eichhornia crassipesWater hyacinthCadmiumMercuryEvidence: field
  • Lolium perennePerennial ryegrassPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsPetroleum hydrocarbonsEvidence: field
  • Miscanthus × giganteusGiant miscanthusCadmiumPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsEvidence: field

Fungi

The rest are on the contaminant pages.

Nearby

Sources

  1. Siti contaminati di interesse nazionale (indicatore, dati a giugno 2024), ISPRA, 2024
  2. Riferimenti normativi per i SIN (aggiornamento 31 dicembre 2025), ISPRA, 2025
  3. Audizione sullo stato di avanzamento dei lavori di bonifica nel SIN di Venezia (Porto Marghera), Commissione parlamentare d'inchiesta sul ciclo dei rifiuti, 2 luglio 2019, ISPRA / SNPA, 2019
  4. SENTIERI. Sesto Rapporto. Epidemiologia & Prevenzione 47(1-2) Suppl. 1: risultati Nord-Est (Venezia-Porto Marghera), Istituto Superiore di Sanità / Epidemiologia & Prevenzione, 2023
  5. Guarino C., Sciarrillo R. The effectiveness and efficiency of phytoremediation of a multicontaminated industrial site: Porto Marghera (Venice Lagoon, Italy). Chemosphere 183, Elsevier, 2017

Draft compiled from public sources, not yet reviewed.